Typical Programs Deliver Typical Results

Your average wellness program is built to be easy for the program providers—not for the program’s real success. They start by assessing employee health and base their results on weak and misleading information.

Self-reported data from HRA’s are highly subjective by nature—strongly influenced by pride and concerns for privacy.

Finger-prick tests may measure glucose and traditional lipid (TCHOL, LDL-C, HDL-C and TG) but do very little to accurately assess the common health issues that drive spending.

Faulty information is then used as the baseline for the entire program—lumping employees into risk groups with very little meaning and value.

Engagement opportunities are generic and employees don’t take the program seriously. Participation quickly wanes.

60%

of high and moderate risks are miscategorized

50%

is the typical peak of participation at enrollment

25%

Within a year, engagement halves

With the many cost containment challenges facing health systems, ACOs and business leaders, this cookie-cutter approach is simply not enough.

Learn More About Uncontained Healthcare Costs

That’s why it’s critical for wellness programs to be built on a stronger foundation.

Comprehensive screenings identify 36% more risk for participants
Highly accurate personal health reports create highly accurate population health assessments
Personalized health improvement plans shift entire populations—one participant at a time

How It Works

Typical Programs Deliver Typical Results

Your average wellness program is built to be easy for the program providers—not for the program’s real success. They start by assessing employee health and base their results on weak and misleading information.

Faulty information is then used as the baseline for the entire program—lumping employees into risk groups with very little meaning and value.

That’s why it’s critical for wellness programs to be built on a stronger foundation.

What We Do

Contact Us